Defining the purpose of superannuation will not necessarily stop politicians tinkering with it, according to a Super Review roundtable.
Deloitte partner, Russell Mason told the roundtable, held during the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) conference, that he did not think defining the purpose of super would stop politicians tinkering with it.
"They will simply say that the changes they are making will better meet the objectives that have been set for superannuation," he said.
Consultant and former Superannuation Complaints Tribunal chairperson, Jocelyn Furlan said that there was nonetheless the need for the major parties to commit to enshrining the purpose of superannuation to stop any short-term policy changes and tinkering around the edges.
"That is a really worthwhile policy conversation to have along with a commitment to having a defined purpose to situation which reduces tinkering which undermines confidence in the super system," she said.
The roundtable agreed that there was merit in enshrining a purpose for superannuation because of the certainty it would bring, but also acknowledged that it was likely that, at some point, politicians would look to test that purpose against what they perceived to be the needs of the Budget.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.