Super scale may disappoint

2 October 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Merging superannuation funds do not always achieve benefits of scale, according to FuturePlus managing director Madeline Dermatossian.

Dermatossian said although benefits of scale could include reduced fees on a per-member allocation basis and in the allocation of fixed costs, risks reached beyond the common risks associated with mergers and acquisitions and included the administrator encountering errors and losses in dealing with much bigger entities.

"The level of benefit from scale is reduced when members are in numerous industries/schemes, administered on several systems or the underlying structures are different," she said.

In cases where members could not be combined, benefits of scale would be reduced by the need to operate on a transaction-by-transaction basis, she said.

According to Dermatossian, funds that managed administration in-house and used bespoke systems would have to bear the brunt of regulatory costs and the internal work necessary to meet deadlines.

Outsourcing administration could provide superannuation funds with a path to achieve costs savings while still resisting the urge to merge, according to Dermatossian, because costs would still be spread over a larger client base.

The shared service model could achieve cost and scale benefits while also reducing risk, she said.

"Funds with outsourced models or [those] that use licensed products can rely on the administrator or vendor to implement changes, and they benefit from the cost being spread over a larger client base.

"Small-to-medium funds can retain their unique identities, value proposition and the qualities that attracted members in the first place - characteristics that can be lost or damaged in merger situations," she said.

Super funds would also gain access to innovative services without the research and development costs, according to Dermatossian.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 7 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 7 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 7 months ago

The fund is set to expand its renewable energy exposure by taking a stake in Atmos Renewables, enhancing long-term returns and diversification. ...

29 minutes hence

Young Australians and tradespeople have faced the greatest risk of super underpayment, with reforms promising to boost their retirement savings....

1 minute ago

Sequoia subsidiary InterPrac has received complaints relating to superannuation investments totalling $22 million following the failure of the Shield Master Fund and Firs...

22 hours 53 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
88.01 3 y p.a(%)
3