Self-managed super fund (SMSF) legislation needs to be addressed if Australia is to avoid the blow-out of pension costs to $68 billion a year by 2020.
National accounting firm Chan & Naylor believes that while SMSFs go a long way to addressing the nation’s lack of retirement funds, Government reform is also needed to fix “serious flaws” in the trust mechanism and create best practice.
These flaws include the arbitrary maximum limit of four members, the potential 93 per cent tax penalty for over payment of contributions and the age limits that restrict members from contributing.
It also lists the need for improving the operating environment of SMSFs to include better education and support, as well as lifting annual concessional contribution limits, which currently stand at $25,000 per year for most Australians.
“None of the above factors assist in the fundamental and bedrock sole purpose test of superannuation, which is to provide retirement income for members,” said Ken Raiss, director of Chan & Naylor.
He believes there should be more focus on maximising superannuation, rather than legislation that taxes and penalises those who contribute more to their retirement.
The Super Members Council has outlined a bold reform plan to boost productivity, lift retirement savings, and unlock super’s full potential.
Women beginning their careers in 2025 could retire with hundreds of thousands of dollars more in super due to the 12 per cent super guarantee rate, HESTA modelling shows.
The two funds have announced the signing of a non-binding MOU to explore a potential merger.
The board must shift its focus from managing inflation to stimulating the economy with the trimmed mean inflation figure edging closer to the 2.5 per cent target, economists have said.