Superannuation of the bench Reforms gaining traction across industry

26 April 2007
| By Mike |

The superannuation industry has embraced financial planning as an integral offering for members, but has strongly rejected a commission-based fee model.

The IUS/Super Review Super Outlook survey has revealed that while the superannuation industry now broadly accepts financial planning must be an integral service offering, it remains sceptical about the actual quality of financial planners.

The survey, conducted through April and early May, confirmed that the superannuation industry remains strongly opposed to commissioned-based financial planning arrangements, with more than 92.5 per cent of respondents indicating their preference for salaried and fee-for-service models where planner remuneration was concerned.

In fact, the survey revealed that 72.1 per cent of respondents wanted a fee-for-service model, while 20.4 per cent favoured a salary model. Only 7.5 per cent indicated they favoured a commission-based model.

The survey also revealed a belief that the implementation of choice of superannuation funds had made financial planning an integral part of the superannuation industry, with 83.4 per cent of respondents citing choice as a primary driver for the acceptance of planning within the industry.

Interestingly, 89.8 per cent of respondents said financial planning should now be provided as a service to members.

However, when it comes to passing a judgement on the abilities of financial planners, the superannuation industry remains somewhat jaundiced in its view, with more than 30 per cent of respondents believing the knowledge levels of financial planners were only either ‘adequate’ or ‘poor’.

Asked how they viewed the knowledge of financial planners as it applies to superannuation, 13.1 per cent of respondents suggested it was ‘excellent’, and that the planners seemed generally well informed, 53.8 per cent said it was ‘good’, and that planners seemed to know enough to deal with most enquiries, while 24.8 per cent said it was ‘adequate’, with planners seeming to get by.

By comparison, 8.3 per cent of respondents rated the knowledge of planners as being ‘poor’ because they did not possess enough knowledge to help people make informed decisions.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 8 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 8 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 8 months ago

Following the roundtable, the Treasurer said the government plans to review the superannuation performance test, stressing that the review does not signal its abolition. ...

2 hours 34 minutes ago

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has placed superannuation front and centre in its 2025-26 corporate plan, signalling a period of intensified scrutin...

9 hours 19 minutes ago

Australian Retirement Trust (ART) has become a substantial shareholder in Tabcorp, taking a stake of just over 5 per cent in the gaming and wagering company....

9 hours 22 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3