The current debate over superannuation fund governance will be reignited in Melbourne next week at an event being hosted by the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST).
The event will see a panel of key players discuss the governance issue, including former Cooper Review chairman and Challenger executive Jeremy Cooper, leading barrister Noel Davis, investment consultant Chris Cuffe, Melbourne QC and chair of TWU Super David Galbally, the chair of AGEST Linda Rubinstein, and AIST chief executive Fiona Reynolds.
Cooper's view on the governance issue is expected to be particularly important to the debate in circumstances where he made a personal submission to the Productivity Commission review into default funds under modern awards.
In that submission Cooper said it remained his view "that the super industry would benefit from an increased participation by talented business people not directly connected to super, but with relevant skills".
AIST has been critical of elements of the governance formula developed by the Financial Services Council.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.