The two large Commonwealth superannuation schemes — the PSS and the CSS — may fall outside the terms of the superannuation tax cuts announced in last month’s Federal Budget.
In a newsletter to members, the Community and Public Sector Union said that while the tax changes would apply to accumulation schemes such as PSSap, AGEST and ARF, the picture was far less clear with respect to defined benefit schemes such as the CSS and the PSS, and this was something that was being worked out with the Government.
“In the Budget material an ‘untaxed’ fund is described as a fund where no employer contribution is made until the benefit is payable and contributions or earning tax is paid,” the newsletter said. “Contributors to the CSS and the PSS pay tax on their contribution, and the earnings of the fund is taxed. What is not taxed is the bulk of the employer component, which is currently part of the Government’s unfunded liability.”
The union said it had met with PSS/CSS chief executive Steve Gibbs and officers of the Department of Finance and Administration, but failed to reach an understanding as to whether the CSS and the PSS were considered to be taxed or untaxed schemes.
The two funds have announced the signing of a non-binding MOU to explore a potential merger.
The board must shift its focus from managing inflation to stimulating the economy with the trimmed mean inflation figure edging closer to the 2.5 per cent target, economists have said.
ASIC chair Joe Longo says superannuation trustees must do more to protect members from misconduct and high-risk schemes.
Super fund mergers are rising, but poor planning during successor fund transfers has left members and employers exposed to serious risks.