The wage boost promise, when the superannuation guarantee was frozen in 2014, never materialised and workers were not compensated for their lost super, according to an enterprise bargaining agreement (EBA) analysis.
The analysis of 8,370 EBAs conducted by Industry Super Australia (ISA), found that while thousands of agreements were locked in place when the SG freeze was announced, most employers saw little need to renegotiate them to pass on the lost super as higher wages.
ISA noted that politicians were again claiming that cutting next year’s legislated 0.5% SG rise would lead to higher wages.
“The economic downturn makes wage rises far less likely now and most economists now concede that Australian workers are not going to receive any real wage growth over the coming years – making the super rate increase the only pay rise on offer for most workers,” ISA said.
“A worker on the cusp of retirement has already lost about $100,000 from previous super guarantee delays, further pauses will compound the losses.
“It is unfair that some politicians – who receive more than 15% super contributions – are once again cruelly asking workers to sacrifice their chance for security and dignity in retirement for nothing in return.”
The rate was scheduled to rise to 10% in 2015, and 0.5% each year after until it reached 12% in 2019. ISA said the delay could cost the average full-time worker in their 30s, $45,000 at retirement.
“The pay cut persisted for years, once those agreements expired the new deals did not include catch up wage increases to compensate for the lost super,” ISA said.
“In agreements certified after the super rate was cut, wage growth fell from 3.33% before the cut to 3.27%. This shows employers pocketed the lost super and workers’ total remuneration also went backwards.
“This paper confirms what Australians already knew, that most employers do not voluntarily return the loss of mandatory super payments as wages and the 2014 super freeze left workers worse off.”
The lower outlook for inflation has set the stage for another two rate cuts over the first half of 2026, according to Westpac.
With private asset valuations emerging as a key concern for both regulators and the broader market, Apollo Global Management has called on the corporate regulator to issue clear principles on valuation practices, including guidance on the disclosures it expects from market participants.
Institutional asset owners are largely rethinking their exposure to the US, with private markets increasingly being viewed as a strategic investment allocation, new research has shown.
Australia’s corporate regulator has been told it must quickly modernise its oversight of private markets, after being caught off guard by the complexity, size, and opacity of the asset class now dominating institutional portfolios.