Watson Wyatt Worldwide has cautioned against "reactionary like-for-like changes" of investment managers by superannuation funds, claiming poor past performance is not a "sufficient condition" for firing an investment manager.
Australia head of research Hugh Dougherty said a "firing is warranted" only when poor performance occurs alongside a loss of skill, a failure of risk control or when an investment manager's results produce negative changes to business or style.
Many superannuation funds are understandably concerned by the combination of exceptionally poor market performance and extreme positive and negative relative performance by investment managers, he said.
"In the extreme situation, where there has been poor market performance and relative performance, trustees and other fund managers are naturally biased to action, but we would caution against reactionary like-for-like changes of investment managers.
"While the interpretation of past performance is complex, it is essential to do this analysis before automatically concluding that a manager has done very poor work," Dougherty said.
Cbus CEO Kristian Fok has criticised lead generators promoting superannuation switches, with the Shield and First Guardian problems being the “tip of the iceberg” for super members.
A global report from Mercer shows that pension systems with no or limited restrictions tend to perform better, while sharing recommendations on how Australia can improve its ranking.
Australian super funds have extended their winning streak into September, as strong global equities and resilient long-term returns boost member outcomes.
The super fund has appointed long-serving technology leader Richard Exton to its executive team, underscoring the fund’s digital transformation priorities.