POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
What’s the difference between IOOF and Hostplus’ use of member funds?
A key Parliamentary committee has discussed the parallels between IOOF Limited’s disputed use of member reserve funds to rectify member balances and Hostplus’s possible use of member funds to pay a penalty imposed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services was told by ASIC commissioner, Danielle Press, that she assumed that Hostplus had paid a $12,000 fine imposed by the regulator from member funds.
The ASIC penalty was imposed over the superannuation fund wrongly using messaging to claim it was providing “independent” financial advice.
NSW Liberal Senator, Andrew Bragg, compared the Hostplus use of member funds to pay the penalty to IOOF Limited’s use of the member’s reserve to recompense members for a mistake made regarding one of the company’s superannuation fund.
“In this case – as opposed to IOOF that has had an internal discussion about whether to pay a fine or to compensate members from either its shareholder capital or from the member reserve – in a case like Hostplus', there is no shareholder capital?” Bragg asked Press.
The committee heard the following exchange:
Bragg: Effectively then, these type of penalties will always be paid from members' money?
Press: I would assume that's correct, yes.
Bragg: Where else would it come from?
Press: It would be paid out of the reserve – yes, the general reserve probably.
Bragg: Would the members of that fund be notified?
Press: I suspect that would depend on the protocols around the use of that reserve. I would suspect not directly, although under the new RG 97 requirements, we would require that any use of reserve be articulated as a fee.
Bragg: Let me just play this out. If there is a fund that doesn't have access to shareholder capital and it receives a substantial fine, where it draws that money from the members' funds, it doesn't necessarily have to disclose that to the members of the fund?
Recommended for you
The super fund announced that Gregory has been appointed to its executive leadership team, taking on the fresh role of chief advice officer.
The deputy governor has warned that, as super funds’ overseas assets grow and liquidity risks rise, they will need to expand their FX hedge books to manage currency exposure effectively.
Super funds have built on early financial year momentum, as growth funds deliver strong results driven by equities and resilient bonds.
The super fund has announced that Mark Rider will step down from his position of chief investment officer (CIO) after deciding to “semi-retire” from full-time work.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
76.97 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
UBS Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF Dis USD
51.13 3 y p.a(%)
4
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
45.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
Select Baker steel Gold Institutional
43.78 3 y p.a(%)
Sounds like double-standards to me....for one, a group of people are in court, for the other, life carries on...?
Once again ISFs have their own set of rules. Wonder what ASIC will think about recent cyber fraud against the ISFs ?