POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Who is morally responsible for compensating early release fraud?
Superannuation funds whose members have been subject to fraud as a result of the workings of the Government’s hardship early release regime will have to contemplate whether to mount a challenge over who should pay for the mistakes.
While a number of superannuation fund executives have told Super Review that the likelihood is that the funds will make good member losses via their so-called member’s reserve, they said this did not address the moral question of superannuation fund reserves being used to compensate members for mistakes which were largely beyond their control.
The issue of moral responsibility for the early release frauds has arisen amid reports that scammers have been using shortcomings in the Government’s MyGov regime and that the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has, in some instances, signed off on early release with respect to fraudulent claims.
What is more, the reports suggest that a number of the people against whom the frauds were perpetrated were not eligible for early release in any case.
The chief executive of small industry superannuation fund, NESS Super, Paul Cahill said that the relatively small size of the fund meant that it had been able to process the early release claims and do its due diligence on the validity of those claims.
“But that is much harder for larger funds and it raises the question of who should ultimately be liable in circumstances where funds are acting on the sign-off of the ATO and the consequent data and authorisations,” he said.
Another superannuation fund chief executive said that where mistakes occurred under the conventional early release regime it was easier to apportion blame because the funds or their administrators were likely to be responsible.
The Assistant Minister for Superannuation, Financial Services and Financial Technology, Senator Jane Hume has been interviewed on national television and has defended the Government’s position and the design of its early release scheme.
She suggested that criticism of the arrangements by superannuation funds was attempt to “throw grit in the wheels to slow the process down”.
Recommended for you
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
76.97 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
UBS Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF Dis USD
51.13 3 y p.a(%)
4
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
45.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
Select Baker steel Gold Institutional
43.78 3 y p.a(%)
