Status and seniority ruled out in TPD claims

12 April 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Maintaining previous job status and standing cannot be called upon to justify being determined totally and permanently disabled (TPD), according to a recent determination by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT).

The SCT has upheld a decision by a superannuation fund and its insurer to refuse a TPD claim by a member which, in part, was based on his claim that alternative forms of employment fell beneath his job status and experience.

The SCT panel noted that the complainant had sought to be declared TPD raising the issue that suggested alternate forms of employment identified as part of a vocational assessment were beneath the seniority he had enjoyed in his previous role.

It said he had suggested that he should not be required to have to more menial occupations such as an administrative assistant or a delivery driver.

However the SCT said the complainant's views were misguided in that the definitions of TPD in both in the relevant insurance policies required the Complainant to be:

  • Policy 1 — … incapacitated to such an extent as to render the Covered Person unlikely ever to engage in or work for reward in any occupation or work for which he or she is reasonably qualified by reason of education, training or experience; or
  • Policy 2 — … incapacitated to such an extent as to render the Insured Member unlikely ever to engage in any gainful profession, trade or occupation for which the Insured Member is reasonably qualified by reason of education, training or experience.

"The definitions are clear in that they require incapacity such that the person being assessed against them must be unlikely ever to engage in any occupation, profession, trade, or work for which they are reasonably qualified as a result of the person's education, training or experience," the determination said.

"Neither definition makes any mention of status, seniority, or of a requirement that the work that they are able to engage in, bares any relationship to the seniority of or contain similar duties (such as the supervision of staff) to the role or roles which the person being assessed held prior to the onset of the condition which caused the incapacity."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

1 day ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

1 day 17 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

1 day 7 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND