The heavier allocation of industry funds towards unlisted assets has seen them marginally outperform their retail fund counterparts during February, according to the latest data released by Chant West.
According to the Chant West research, industry funds and retail funds produced broadly similar results in February, with returns of -0.4 per cent and -0.5 per cent respectively, but the company noted that industry funds still held the advantage over the longer term, having returned 6.7 per cent a year against 5.4 per cent for retail funds over the 15 years to February 2016.
It said performance over three, five, seven, and 10 years was closer with retail funds actually ahead over seven years.
The analysis noted that industry funds' particularly strong outperformance over the year to February was mainly due to higher allocations to unlisted assets such as unlisted infrastructure, unlisted property, and private equity.
It said these allocations had outperformed listed markets over the period.
"Australian and international share markets, which are down 13.4 per cent and 9.6 per cent, respectively, over the past year, are marked to market. However, unlisted assets are valued infrequently with their valuations typically lagging listed markets by six to nine months," the Chant West analysis said.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.