The times have again suited the asset allocations of industry superannuation funds, according to the last data released by Chant West.
While retail superannuation funds with heavier allocations towards listed markets outperformed industry through much of the recovery from the global financial crisis, the Chant West data confirms that industry fund allocations have again rewarded members in the more challenging environment over the past eight months.
Explaining the phenomenon, Chant West principal, Warren Chant said that, over the longer term, industry funds had outperformed retail funds largely because, as a group, they had tended to have lower allocations to listed shares during periods when shares underperformed.
“While that historical difference in allocation no longer applies, they have also had higher allocations to unlisted assets such as private equity, unlisted property, and unlisted infrastructure which have performed well for them. That difference still applies, with industry funds currently investing 20 per cent in these sectors against five per cent for retail funds,” he said.
Chant said that, over the longer term, the asset allocation policies of industry funds had served them very well because while the allocations to unlisted assets did mean slightly higher investment costs, those extra costs had been more than justified by the better performance and lower volatility.
“Industry funds have also been more prepared to shift away from their longer-term target asset allocations to take advantage of mispricing or to preserve capital,” he said.
“Overall, those medium-term shifts have had a positive effect on their performance.”
Chant said 2015 had provided another great example of the benefits of diversification and by that he meant the way funds spread their investments far beyond listed shares, property, bonds and cash to avoid getting dragged down if those traditional sectors have a poor year.
“In 2015 Australian shares, hedged international shares, Australian and international bonds all produced fairly anaemic returns of 3.5 per cent or lower, yet growth funds still managed to average 5.8 per cent,” he said.
“They did that by including alternative, unlisted assets in their investment mix and by letting currency movements work to their advantage.”
