X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Superannuation Guide
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the Super Review bulletin
  • News
    • Technology
    • Financial Advice
    • Funds Management
    • Institutional Investment
    • SMSF
    • Insurance
    • Superannuation
    • Post Retirement
    • People & Products
    • Rollover
    • Women’s Wealth
  • Investment Centre
  • Features & Analysis
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Features
    • Roundtables
    • Knowledge Centre
  • Events
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Technology
    • Financial Advice
    • Funds Management
    • Institutional Investment
    • SMSF
    • Insurance
    • Superannuation
    • Post Retirement
    • People & Products
    • Rollover
    • Women’s Wealth
  • Investment Centre
  • Features & Analysis
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Features
    • Roundtables
    • Knowledge Centre
  • Events
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News Insurance

Most Aussies against subsidising genetically at-risk insureds

Just over 60 per cent of Australians are against subsidising life insurance premiums for people who are at higher risk of future illness based on adverse genetic test results, the FSC has found.

by Hannah Wootton
December 11, 2018
in Insurance, News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Just over 60 per cent of Australians are against subsidising life insurance premiums for people who are at higher risk of future illness based on adverse genetic test results, the Financial Services Council (FSC) has found, two months after it announced a moratorium on insurers using the results of previous tests for risk products up to $500,000.

The moratorium, effective from July next year, was part of the FSC’s proposed new Life Insurance Code of Practice and followed recommendations from geneticists and this year’s Parliamentary Joint Committee inquiry into the life insurance industry.

X

“Our consumer research shows many Australians are open to taking a genetic test to predict the likelihood of becoming ill in future, but also support the principle of setting insurance premiums individually based on the likelihood of making a claim,” FSC senior policy manager, Nick Kirwan, said.

The research found that almost two-thirds of the 1,000 surveyed consumers would be prepared to take a genetic test that could tell if they had a higher chance of serious disease in the future, with the overwhelming majority saying they would take a test through the established medical system with a few preferring to take it anonymously even if at personal cost.

A small minority were willing to pay a little extra ($5) to subsidise people with adverse genetic testing results, but this reduced dramatically as the subsidy increased. People most opposed to offering a subsidy were respondents who were older or with lower incomes.

“Life insurers need to balance the interests of all Australians, and not just act in the interests of those who have had an adverse genetic test result. The moratorium is designed to help get this balance right,” Kirwan said.

Tags: Financial Services CouncilFSCGenetic Test ResultsInsuranceInsurance PremiumsLife InsuranceLife Insurance Code Of PracticeLife Insurance IndustryMedical SystemNick KirwanParliamentary Join CommitteeRisk ProductsSubsidies

Related Posts

Using data to achieve member experience success

by Staff Writer
December 4, 2025

A panel of superannuation commentators have shared how data and technology can be used to improve the member experience at...

ASFA releases latest Retirement Standard data

by Laura Dew
December 4, 2025

The budget needed for a couple to fund a comfortable retirement has reached more than $76,000, rising by 1.6 per cent in...

APRA warns super trustees lag as systemic risks rise

by Adrian Suljanovic
December 4, 2025

APRA has called on super trustees to close widening performance gaps as superannuation becomes more critical to financial stability. Appearing...

Comments 1

  1. Colour me shocked! says:
    7 years ago

    “People most opposed to offering a subsidy were respondents who were older or with lower incomes.”

    What a surprise! Older people, whose insurance is already being subsidised by young, healthy people or people on lower incomes (because they don’t believe they will have any genetic indicators, their tune will change suddenly when they realise they do).

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Using data to achieve member experience success

A panel of superannuation commentators have shared how data and technology can be used to improve the member experience at...

by Staff Writer
December 4, 2025
Promoted Content

To the expert guiding the doers

Everyone has their own reason for wanting to stay healthier, for longer.

by Partner Article
October 7, 2025
Promoted Content

Developing Next-Generation Fintech Applications on High-Speed Blockchain Networks

The evolution of financial technology continues accelerating with the emergence of high-speed blockchain networks that enable unprecedented performance and cost...

by Partner Article
September 4, 2025
Promoted Content

Smart finance is the key to winning in the property investment surge

Australian property prices are rising again, presenting a compelling opportunity for investors. For the first time in four years, every Australian...

by Partner Article
August 13, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Top Performing Funds

FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3 y p.a(%)
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
220.82
2
Loftus Peak Global Disruption Fund Hedged
110.90
3
Quay Global Real Estate Fund (Unhedged) Active ETF Hedged
89.15
4
SGH Income Trust Dis AUD
80.01
5
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.11
Super Review is Australia’s leading website servicing all segments of Australia’s superannuation and institutional investment industry. It prides itself on in-depth news coverage and analysis of important areas of this market, such as: Investment trends, Superannuation, Funds performance, Technology, Administration, and Custody

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Investment Centre
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • Superannuation
  • People And Products
  • Financial Advice
  • Funds Management
  • Institutional Investment
  • Insurance
  • Features And Analysis

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
    • All News
    • Technology
    • Financial Advice
    • Funds Management
    • Institutional Investment
    • SMSF
    • Insurance
    • Superannuation
    • Post Retirement
    • People & Products
    • Rollover
    • Women’s Wealth
  • Superannuation Guide
  • Features & Analysis
    • All Features & Analysis
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Features
    • Roundtables
    • Knowledge Centre
  • Events
  • Investment Centre
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited