Arbitrary, "one-size-fits-all" deferral periods on deferred lifetime annuities (DLA) will impede optimal retirement outcomes for individuals, investment management firm Challenger said.
Chief executive of Challenger Life Richard Howes argued for more flexibility as this well allow for better tailoring, a larger insured pool and potentially higher income.
"Generally speaking, we'd expect retirees to find longer deferral periods far more attractive than shorter deferrals anyway," he said.
"The income payments on long-dated DLAs will be significantly higher due to compounding and the earning of mortality credits between purchase and payments commencing."
His comments follow the release of a Treasury discussion paper on the review of retirement income regulation in July, which accepted the current rules are hindering post-retirement products.
The paper said a minimum deferral period would be in line with the aim of the product — that is, a type of longevity insurance that provides income if the member outlasts their life expectancy.
It lets them draw down on their other savings with more certainty up to that period, it said.
But it accepted that not setting a minimum deferral period would let product providers offer DLAs with very short deferral periods, which would be like an immediate annuity with a ‘drawdown holiday' in the first few years, in return for higher annual payments.
Howes said DLAs should be defined as a pension under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 so it can be exempt from the earnings tax and benefits tax.
"Non-commutable DLAs are a risk product and like other risk products shouldn't be subject to tax before benefits are paid," he said.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes between 3 and 51 per cent by incorporating personal and household data into their retirement income strategies, according to new research.
The best interests duty and new class of adviser didn't make the cut for the pre-election DBFO draft bill; however, ASFA has used its submission to outline what it wants to see from the final package.
The peak body stressed that the proposed financial advice reforms should “pass as soon as possible” and has thrown its weight behind super funds providing a greater level of advice.
Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting; however, some admit the decision will be a close call.