POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Retirement review too narrow -AIST
The Treasury's review of Retirement Income Stream Sustainability is too narrow and should, properly, look at the sustainability of the underlying tax settings, according to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST).
The AIST has used its submission to the Treasury inquiry to argue that such an expansion of the inquiry is warranted in circumstances where questions may ultimately arise over whether there is any real advantage in retirement incomes steams over amounts invested in competing non-superannuation investments.
The submission also questioned the sustainability of superannuation restrictions and whether they formed a barrier to retirement savings, and the adequacy of social security arrangements, and "what is accomplished by means testing parity between non-superannuation and superannuation products".
The submission also pointed to the issues associated with longevity risk "as part of a larger basket of financial risks which include greater exploration of investment risks, as well as mortality risk".
The AIST submission said that it believed that there existed no single answer to which type of income stream product would enable retirees to better manage risks in the retirement phase.
The submission also strongly disputed a claim contained in the Treasury paper that "…a defining feature of account-based products is that the holder bears the full extent of the risks— in particular, investment and longevity risks—associated with the product…"
"This is a conclusion upon which most of the discussion in this paper rests," it said.
However the AIST submission said that the conclusion that an investor in an account-based retirement income stream bears the full extent of risks was "erroneous".
"The assumption…that there is a magic product that addresses both longevity risk and the many competing investment risks is fanciful," the submission said.
Recommended for you
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes between 3 and 51 per cent by incorporating personal and household data into their retirement income strategies, according to new research.
The best interests duty and new class of adviser didn't make the cut for the pre-election DBFO draft bill; however, ASFA has used its submission to outline what it wants to see from the final package.
The peak body stressed that the proposed financial advice reforms should “pass as soon as possible” and has thrown its weight behind super funds providing a greater level of advice.
Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting; however, some admit the decision will be a close call.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
88.01 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
72.60 3 y p.a(%)
3
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
44.46 3 y p.a(%)
4
Pengana High Conviction Equities B
39.12 3 y p.a(%)
5
Pengana High Conviction Equities A
39.05 3 y p.a(%)
