Brand and marketing expenses by superannuation funds can be demonstrably linked to members’ best financial interest, as long as the appropriate framework is applied, according to Forethought research.
In light of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s revised expectations, whereby the onus now fell on the trustee to quantitatively demonstrate how brand and marketing expenses was in the best financial interests of members (MFBI) and would deliver member return on investment (MROI), Forethought developed what it called the ARRMS framework.
The ARRMS framework consisted of a process whereby a fund must define their marketing purpose in the context of MBFI, evaluate and rank marketing efforts against an MROI metric, prioritise marketing activity, develop a measurement strategy based on key performance indicators and establish a monitoring program.
In its report, the marketing research consultancy said effective marketing which raised Brand Health (a forethought metric) led to market share growth, which delivered financial benefits of scale in the form of lower average costs to members and was therefore in their best interest.
Source: Forethought
It said funds would need to link strategy with brand execution, requiring funds to implement both lead metrics (goal achievement likelihoods through surveys) and lag metrics (outcome tracking).
“Understanding the specific statistical relationship between input and outcome is the first step to being able to validate that marketing expenditure is indeed, undertaken in members’ best financial interest,” Forethought said in its report.
In a recent study, Forethought tracked Brand Health across six undisclosed industry superannuation brands from 2014-21.
Of the half that improved brand health, market share increased, while the others declined.
Forethought in collaboration with the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) were expected to host a masterclass on the ARRMS framework in March.
The lower outlook for inflation has set the stage for another two rate cuts over the first half of 2026, according to Westpac.
With private asset valuations emerging as a key concern for both regulators and the broader market, Apollo Global Management has called on the corporate regulator to issue clear principles on valuation practices, including guidance on the disclosures it expects from market participants.
Institutional asset owners are largely rethinking their exposure to the US, with private markets increasingly being viewed as a strategic investment allocation, new research has shown.
Australia’s corporate regulator has been told it must quickly modernise its oversight of private markets, after being caught off guard by the complexity, size, and opacity of the asset class now dominating institutional portfolios.