Superannuation fund trustees have been cautioned against treating parents or guardians differently with respect to death benefit distributions to minor beneficiaries.
Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) chair, Jocelyn Furlan has used the tribunal's quarterly update to tell fund trustees that they will need to have sound reasons for excluding parents/guardians from such process.
"The Tribunal expects that trustees will have considered the circumstances of each minor beneficiary and have reasons for their decision that the parent/guardian is unsuitable to be the trustee of the benefit," she wrote.
Furlan said trustees needed to be careful about applying rules without regard to individual circumstances, especially if different rules were applied depending on whether the surviving parent/guardian was themselves dependent on the deceased member.
"In the Tribunal's view, there is unlikely to be a sound reason, relating to the ability to be a trustee of the benefit, for treating a surviving dependent parent/guardian differently from a surviving non-dependent parent/guardian, all other things being equal," she wrote.
"In the absence of evidence that the parent/guardian is unfit to care for the beneficiary's physical, mental and emotional wellbeing, significant independent evidence would be required to indicate that that person is unfit to care for the beneficiary's financial wellbeing."
"Where no concerns have been raised about the parent/guardian's capacity to care for the beneficiary generally, requiring him or her to seek approval and funds from a third party trustee of the benefit to provide for the minor beneficiary's needs is a significant impost, in an environment that has already been affected by a death that is usually premature and often unforeseen," Furlan wrote.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.