POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Govt opens consultation on $3m super balance tax changes
The Government has released the consultation paper for ‘better targeted superannuation concessions’ following its announcement last month to double the concessional tax rate for multi-million dollar balances.
With this reform, the headline tax rate for super balances exceeding $3 million would stand at 30 per cent, up from 15 per cent.
It would apply from 2025-26 and affect less than 80,000 people, according to Treasury.
It was expected to bring in approximately $2 billion in additional tax over four years.
Elaborating on the policy, the consultation paper stated the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) would collect the relevant information and calculate the tax liability for an individual’s total superannuation balance (TSB).
Additionally, the proposed approach intended to leverage existing reporting requirements to minimise the regulatory impact on super funds and members though some additional reporting by super funds may be required to support the ATO.
The paper noted SMSFs already reported benefit payments at the member level on an annual basis.
Where additional information was required, it proposed the ATO would receive this information directly from super trustees through changes to the general reporting requirements, specific requests for information by the ATO, or a combination of both.
Super funds which had no members with a TSB greater than $3 million would be unimpacted by this proposal, it stated.
Questions raised for stakeholders in the consultation paper included:
- Do you have an alternative to the proposed method of calculating earnings on balances above $3 million? What are the benefits and disadvantages of any alternatives proposed including a consideration of compliance costs, complexity and sector neutrality?
- What changes to reporting requirements by superannuation funds would be required to support the proposed calculation or any alternative calculation methods?
- Does the proposed methodology for determining the tax liability create any unintended consequences?
- What types of outflows (withdrawals) should be adjusted for and how?
- What types of inflows (net contributions) should be adjusted for and how?
Bodies like Industry Super Australia (ISA), the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST), and Aware Super had voiced its support for the reform while the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) had stated cautious optimism in reading the “significant” measures.
Submissions to the consultation were open until 17 April, 2023.
AUTHOR
Rhea Nath
Rhea L Nath is a journalist on Super Review and InvestorDaily, with a focus on funds management, superannuation, and institutional investment. Previously, she covered small business and entrepreneurship news at Dynamic Business and multicultural issues at Indian Link Media Group. In 2022, she was named Young Journalist of the Year at the NSW Premier’s Multicultural Communications Awards.
Recommended for you
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
90.28 3 y p.a(%)
2
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
37.08 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.44 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.12 3 y p.a(%)
5
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
28.28 3 y p.a(%)
