POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Stop dumping regulatory costs on consumers: ASFA
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has questioned government's "increasing tendency" to dump regulatory costs on Australian consumers.
It said it appeared government departments were increasingly looking to consumers to wear the brunt of costs.
Government also ignored the direct costs to those entities, according to ASFA, in a submission to the Department of Finance and Deregulation on the Government's cost recovery guidelines. It said further submissions had been raised in regards to Cost Recovery Impact Statements (CRIS) released by AUSTRAC.
It said levies were being put on the public with no supporting material for what public benefit the levy supplied.
"There has been an absence of proper acknowledgment of the direct cost that regulation has already imposed on those entities or due regard for whether the regulation provides a broader public good which is more appropriately funded from consolidated revenue," it said.
ASFA said any charges should reflect the costs of providing the service and should be implemented on a fee-for-service basis, and where required, a levy.
It also said it was important the guidelines did not advocate costs recovery where it was not cost-effective or where it would stifle competition.
ASFA said it was redundant for an agency to develop a Cost Recovery Impact Statement (CRIS) where it has already compiled a Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) that addresses cost recovery arrangements.
It said a compulsory agency review should be periodic, and at a minimum, every five years.
In a separate submission to Treasury, ASFA requested the Government review the term "lost" to describe disengaged or uncontactable members.
"For those members to be approached and told they are 'lost' causes confusion for the member and reputational damage to the fund," it said.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Money Management staff writers are writers who contribute to the website from time to time. If you would like to discuss the content contained within this article please contact us.
Recommended for you
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
93.34 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
36.96 3 y p.a(%)
3
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
34.22 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
29.68 3 y p.a(%)
5
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (AU)
28.89 3 y p.a(%)
