POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Super complaints excluded from AFCA’s updated compensation caps
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has updated the monetary limits and compensation caps for the complaints it receives, which notably exclude superannuation complaints.
These cover the maximum value of a claim for compensation and the maximum amount that can be awarded to a consumer or small business for complaints about banking and finance, general insurance, life insurance, and investments and advice.
The rules are updated every three years in line with the higher of either the percentage increase in Consumer Price Index inflation and male total average weekly earnings.
However, super complaints have been excluded as they are subject to separate rules and the no monetary limit applies in the superannuation jurisdiction, AFCA said. For most other complaints, a limit per claim applies.
The maximum value of a claim from a consumer from 1 January 2024 cannot exceed $1,263,000 or $6,317,000 if claimed by a small business or primary producer. The sum for a consumer claim has increased from $1,085,000 in the previous three years and $1 million pre-2021.
The new sum applies to all complaints received by AFCA from 1 January 2024.
It also noted a financial firm that is the subject of a complaint may be asked to contribute to legal, professional, or travel costs incurred by the complainants that would be no more than $5,000.
When it comes to super complaints, AFCA’s powers to determine such complaints are set out in section 1055 of the Corporations Act and are summarised in rules D.1.1 and D.1.2 of AFCA’s complaints resolution scheme rules.
“The compensation set out in rule D.3 and the monetary caps in rule D.4 do not apply to superannuation complaints, however, we can consider whether it was unfair or unreasonable for a trustee not to settle a claim or take a different approach to the claim,” AFCA explained.
“We may apply a remedy that results in the payment of compensation to a complainant in respect of losses they have suffered.”
It noted that in determining super complaints, AFCA decision-makers consider all of the available information to see whether there are adverse practical outcomes or consequences of a decision for the complainant and joined parties, in the case of a death benefit payment decision.
“While there is no monetary limit for superannuation, our powers to provide a remedy can only be used for the purpose of placing the complainant as nearly as practicable in a position that any unfairness or unreasonableness no longer exists,” AFCA added.
Earlier this month, AFCA chief operating officer Justin Untersteiner told Super Review there was an “enormous increase” in complaints regarding super funds in 2023.
The organisation reported it had seen over 100,000 complaints in 2023 for the first time and there had been a 20 per cent rise in the number of these relating to delays in claims handling.
Some 10,692 complaints were reported to AFCA regarding this issue, second only to complaints about unauthorised transactions.
Many of these related to super and insurance in super, the organisation said.
Speaking to Super Review, Untersteiner said: “Super and insurance make up the complaints regarding delays in claims handling, there has been an enormous increase in complaints against super trustees and top of that was complaints about delays in claim handling.
“We are encouraging trustees to review this as lengthy delays aren’t fair on consumers.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Laura Dew is editor at Super Review. Prior to joining SR, she spent five years working at Investment Week in the UK covering asset and wealth management.
Recommended for you
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
90.28 3 y p.a(%)
2
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
37.08 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.44 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.12 3 y p.a(%)
5
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
28.28 3 y p.a(%)
