Super funds face heavy APRA workload

29 August 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation funds have learned the degree of extra work they will need to take on to meet the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s new member outcomes test requirements including benchmarking outcomes across almost all outputs, including superannuation.

The regulator has finalised changes to its requirements with APRA deputy chair, Helen Rowell also announcing that all superannuation fund licensees would also have to perform an annual Business Performance Review to assess whether they were delivering sound, value-for-money outcomes for members.

“Where the legislated outcomes assessment requires RSE licensees to assess member outcomes at a product level at a point in time, APRA’s Business Performance Review also requires them to assess outcomes across a broader range of metrics for different member cohorts,” she said.

“Further, licensees must consider whether they will continue to deliver quality outcomes for all their members into the future, and take action if they identify areas needing improvement.”

But it is the detail contained in APRA’s Prudential Practice Guide 516 which will gain most attention from superannuation fund boards and executives because of the degree of detail it dictates with respect to benchmarking everything from investment returns through to fees and costs to insurance and retirement products.

However, the Practice Guide at least acknowledges that insurance benchmarking may prove difficult because of the unique nature of the products.

The Practice Guide said that the factors APRA regarded as relevant to analysis included, but were not limited to:

  • the investment strategy set under Prudential Standard SPS 530 Investment Governance;
  • insurance arrangements;
  • options, benefits and facilities provided to members, including the availability of employer subsidised fees to certain member cohorts;
  • the fee structures adopted by the RSE licensee;
  • the scale of the RSE licensee’s business operations; and
  • the costs incurred by the RSE licensee to operate and manage its business operations.

“APRA expects that an RSE licensee would detail a factor’s impact on the results of the performance analysis, including quantifying the impact where possible.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

1 hour ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

18 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

8 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND