Super system skewed against women

13 October 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The generosity of the tax expenditures on superannuation, and the limited controls on contributions, greatly magnify the negative effects of a superannuation system on gender inequality, according to the Curtin University based, Women in Social and Economic Research group (WiSER).

The group has used a submission to the Senate Inquiry into the Economic Security of Women in Retirement to argue that the superannuation system, as it currently stands, is skewed towards men and those who are well off.

"The groups most able to benefit from the tax expenditures on superannuation are high income earners and those with flexible assets that can be moved into the tax-advantaged superannuation system," the submission said.

"Because women are underrepresented in these groups, they receive a relatively small share of the benefits of the increasingly large tax expenditures on superannuation."

The WiSER submission said that its overall evaluation of Australian policy on retirement savings and income on the criteria of gender equity was "negative".

"The shift in focus toward superannuation, and especially the large tax expenditures on superannuation, has exacerbated rather than reduced gender inequality," it claimed adding that, "generally, the policy settings are also contributing to higher levels of inequality in the incomes of older Australians".

"Under the current policy settings some retirees, and statistically more men than women, who have accumulated significant assets in superannuation will access large tax-free incomes in retirement and derive the benefits for health and care that this provides," the submission said.

"Others, and more commonly women than men, will continue to depend on the age pension, which will deliver them an increasingly frugal existence."

The submission said that, fundamentally there was a need to balance the resourcing of superannuation tax concessions and the age pension.

"This will require a substantial winding back of the tax concessions available for superannuation," it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Shaun on Tue, 10/13/2015 - 13:46

Don't you think that the system is skewed towards people who are in paid work, rather than being skewed against a particular gender?

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

Financial advice is having a significant impact on how Australians are engaging with the more complex aspects of their superannuation, new findings have shown. ...

22 hours hence

The sovereign wealth fund grew $11.5 billion in the March quarter, according to its latest portfolio update, having previously voiced caution about inflation’s downward t...

22 hours ago

The professional body is calling for the annual performance test to transition to a two-metric test, so it better aligns with the overarching duty of super fund trustees ...

1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND