Many of the largest superannuation funds in Australia are relying on mergers to mask relatively weak organic growth, according to a report by Tria Investment Partners.
Tria managing partner Andres Baker said the report revealed the extent to which funds were dependent upon mergers to fuel growth in a weak economic environment.
"Beneath the headline growth numbers, organic growth generated by net inflows remains a clear challenge. Strip away growth achieved from expensive merger and acquisition exercises and we are left with some market participants struggling to keep pace with system growth," said Baker.
While many of the funds that have undertaken mergers are in "market leading positions", they face the challenge of retaining their current funds under management, Baker said.
The Tria Super Funds Review examined 81 funds across all sectors, with assets under management of over $1 billion.
The report is an expansion of the Tria Industry Fund Review, and allows subscribers to compare the health and position of super funds from different market segments, said Baker.
The report also includes maps of the total market, the impact of mergers, market share tables, net inflow rankings, insights and trends, and profiles of all 81 funds reviewed, according to Tria.
Data from Chant West reinforced on Friday that super funds finished April in positive territory despite ‘Liberation Day’-driven market turmoil.
Australia’s superannuation leaders gathered in Melbourne on Thursday for a closed-door forum tackling the escalating impact of artificial intelligence and shifting retirement income models on the sector.
The Treasurer has shown no signs of wavering on the construction of the controversial tax, while Liberal senator Jane Hume has urged the new economics team to “speak sense” to Jim Chalmers.
Volatile markets driven by shifting US tariff policy failed to rattle Australia’s superannuation system in April, with balanced options inching upward.