Superannuation executives have warned super funds to implement more oversight of intra-fund advice and superannuation advice from associated planners to combat risk.
Speaking at an Association of Super Funds of Australia (ASFA) lunch, Superpartners executive general manager for corporate services Lucienne Layton suggested that there needed to be more hands-on monitoring of intrafund advice if super funds outsourced it to planning practices.
"Speaking purely as a risk manager, if I was outsourcing advice, I would want to see a lot more hands on monitoring than I have generally seen across the financial services industry as a professional services consultant," she said.
Super funds faced the risk of not knowing exactly what was going on when intra-fund advice was being provided, and whether that advice given was the right advice and appropriate for a fund's members, Layton said.
Head of risk and compliance at Qantas Super Hugh Loughrey suggested there was structural risks around outsourcing superannuation advice functions.
Conflicts of interest and the provision of best interest duties presented a number of challenges, Loughrey said, while there was also the possibility of reputational risk for the super fund.
"It's a very individual decision for the trustees who have their own circumstances," he said, depending on what level of conflict or control they wanted.
"That might influence the outcome around their attitude towards how do you balance that relationship," he said.
