POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Employer opt-out unbalanced say AIST
The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) says unilateral employer discretion will erode the balance of employer and employee best interests in choosing default funds for awards.
AIST's submission to the Productivity Commission's draft report into default superannuation funds in modern awards has supported the establishment of an expert panel under Fair Work Australia (FWA), but said employers should not be able to opt-out of default arrangements once they had been decided.
"If employer discretion can be exercised without a requirement to notify that choice and without the need to meet an explicit 'member interest' test, then the notion that the award selection process has substance and protects interests becomes worthless," it said.
The Productivity Commission was incorrect to assume employees' and employers' views on the selection of default funds would always converge, according to AIST.
"There may be features of a superannuation fund that may not be seen as desirable by some employers, even though they provide real and direct benefits to employees," the submission said.
AIST said FWA should have the power to create single-issue enterprise agreements that exist side-by-side with other enterprise agreements that apply at the workplace and could replace the "flawed" opt-out clause.
"As well as covering superannuation, such agreements should also identify the parties covered, the nominal term of the agreement, a consultative mechanism and dispute settlement procedures," it said.
AIST said out-sourcing the expert panel was too risky.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) in its submission to the Productivity Commission said it was too early to cement default arrangements that made assumptions about MySuper,
ASFA disputed many of the findings in the report, including the number of 'choice' superannuation members and the average number of superannuation accounts per member. ASFA said most of the complaints to the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal had been regarding the decision of trustees and not their conduct.
ASFA recommended, at a minimum, the merit-based appointment of superannuation fund trustees.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Money Management staff writers are writers who contribute to the website from time to time. If you would like to discuss the content contained within this article please contact us.
Recommended for you
The Financial Services Minister says the amendments to the SIS Act within the first QAR bill will “clarify the law to affirm the status quo”.
Superannuation funds have thrown their support behind the QAR reforms but want a “clear statement” that they will not be required to check all member SOAs.
In its latest report, the corporate regulator says the deduction of advice fees has led to instances of “inappropriate erosion of members’ balances”.
Financial advice is having a significant impact on how Australians are engaging with the more complex aspects of their superannuation, new findings have shown.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
66.99 3 y p.a(%)
2
Hills International
59.27 3 y p.a(%)
3
Acadian Global Equity Long Short Class A
32.82 3 y p.a(%)
4
CFS FC Acadian Global Equity Long Short
32.44 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
32.01 3 y p.a(%)
Add new comment