AIA pushes case for worker rehab

24 May 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government would need to change no fewer than four Commonwealth acts and then implement new legislation and regulation if life/risk insurers were to be allowed to have greater involvement in worker rehabilitation.

That is the bottom line of a submission filed by major insurer AIA Australia Limited, which claimed that allowing private sector life insurers to have greater involvement in worker rehabilitation would “help create a more complete system for supporting those who have an injury or illness that is impacting their ability to work”.

It said that to allow life insurers to fund medical treatment and medical expenses, amendments would need to be made to the Life Insurance Act 1995 (Cth), Private Health Insurance Act 2007 (Cth), Private Health Insurance (Health Insurance Business) Rules 2017, Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth), the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) and the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994.

The submission said these legislative changes would then need to be supplemented by “principles that protect consumer interests and provide guidance and clarity. These principles should be included in regulations or otherwise included in the Financial Services Council Life Insurance Code of Practice”.

Confronted by trade union and consumer group opposition to the proposal, the AIA submission, filed with the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services claimed, “allowing life insurers to fund medical treatment and medical expenses for eligible claimants under a continuous disability policy will help to minimise existing gaps in our income support and healthcare system that may restrict or prevent effective return to work”.

“The proposed changes are intended to complement, not replace, existing income support and healthcare systems,” the submission said.

“Allowing life insurers to fund medical treatment and medical expenses will deliver Shared Value. That is, it will create benefits for individuals and their families, Government and society, and life insurers. It is a win-win-win solution,” the AIA submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Will on Fri, 05/25/2018 - 15:56

In my experience, when you unpack what AIA really wants to do, which is currently being poorly tested on Sunsuper members, the sole purpose results in imposing a further hurdle and ability for life insurers to delay, deny and defend legitimate TPD and IP claims.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 3 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

14 hours ago

A survey of almost 6,000 fund members has identified weakening retirement confidence, particularly among those under 55 years of age, signalling an opportunity for super ...

14 hours ago

The Financial Services Minister says the amendments to the SIS Act within the first QAR bill will “clarify the law to affirm the status quo”....

16 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND