The Government should go further in addressing superannuation guarantee (SG) non-payment including legislating for the monthly payment of SG contributions, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).
In a submission to the Treasury responding to proposed legislative changes including tightening the rules around salary sacrifice contributions, ASFA suggested the Government could go even further.
Looking at the legislative amendments which had flowed from the work of the Government’s so-called Cross-Agency Working Group, the ASFA submission said it would welcome further Government actions including requiring employers to pay SG contributions monthly and enhancing the powers of the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).
It said the powers of the ATO could be strengthened around phoenixing activity by company directors with the ATO being required to notify employees before they enter into an SG payment plan with an employer.
The ASFA submission also suggested expanding the Fair Entitlements Guarantee to include unpaid SG contributions and removing the earnings threshold of $450 per month, below which employers are not required to make SG contributions for employees.
It said the proposed changes were either raised in ASFA’s submission to the recent inquiry by the Senate Economics Reference Committee into non-payment of SG or by the working group’s final report.
“We urge the Government to consider these measures, and the remaining recommendations of the working group, to develop a comprehensive policy response to the issue of SG non-payment,” the submission said.
There is a need for Australia’s superannuation funds to simplify their investment menus, according to the firm, given over a third of funds have more than 30 options, of which one or more are “arguably subscale”.
The research house is set to offer research ratings of superannuation funds for the first time amid growing demand from financial advisers.
Treasury is calling for submissions on its draft regulations in relation to the calculation of the proposed Division 296 tax.
Initially intended to offer a “simple, cost-effective” option for Aussies invested in default fund options, a super consultant has weighed in on what the scheme has actually done for members.
Add new comment