Exclude advice obligations from insurance claims: ASFA

9 April 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Insurance claims handling should not be subject to the same obligations as financial advice, according to major superannuation funds body, the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

In a submission filed with the Federal Treasury in response to moves to make insurance claims-handling a financial service, ASFA also urged against making it a requirement for superannuation funds to obtain an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL), noting that not all funds are currently licensed.

“… not all RSE licensees hold an AFSL,” it said. “ASFA considers that while such licensees should be held to account in the same way as other trustees, it would be beneficial if RSE licensees were not required to obtain an AFSL for the sole purpose of satisfying this claims handling obligation.

“ASFA would be happy to establish a consultation group made up of ASFA members to assist ASIC if it wishes to explore these issues further and to ensure that this reform is adapted to the superannuation environment to achieve its purpose as efficiently as possible.

“Finally, ASFA acknowledges that the consultation paper has already identified this as a risk but we wish to emphasise the importance of claims handling obligations being kept separate from those related to financial, especially personal, advice,” the submission said.

“If claims handling were to be regarded as subject to the financial advice obligations, fund members would suffer increased costs and delays due to disclosure requirements and limits on the range of information that could be provided with no obvious additional benefit to the fund member,” it said.

The submission said that while ASFA supported the Royal Commission recommendation that insurance claims handling be made a financial service it believed insurance inside superannuation needed to be treated in a different manner to insurance outside superannuation.

“…we consider that insurance in superannuation needs to be viewed differently from insurance provided outside the superannuation environment. A different approach may be required for the treatment of RSE licensees to ensure that the same objectives are achieved both within and outside the superannuation system,” it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

5 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

The newly created role comes amid the fund’s ambitions to be a ‘merger partner of choice’ in the superannuation industry....

11 hours ago

Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....

3 days 10 hours ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

4 days 10 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND