Add new comment

Submitted by Jeff Humphreys on Tue, 07/05/2016 - 14:28

"....But, objectively, are the changes announced by the Treasurer Scott Morrison in the 3 May Budget an appropriate mix capable of serving the best interests of superannuation funds and their members over the three-year life of Parliament?..."

What does this mean? That the taxpayer has to fund our industry with an open cheque book? The reality is the Costello open cheque book days were always unsustainable. It is appropriate that the Liberals tidy up the mess they made and that is all they are doing. The industry needs to support government in this rather than acting as a self serving, rent seeking part of the economy apparently incapable of existence without compulsion and massive tax subsidies.

The objective for super has been set out much more appropriately by Murray and the politicians. If our industry cannot get on board we are going to go the way of motor vehicle manufacturing where people end up saying enough is enough and take the trough away.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 3 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

A number of measures, including super on Paid Parental Leave, funding to recover unpaid super, and frameworks to encourage investment in the energy transition, have been ...

2 hours 35 minutes ago

A professional says all roads will lead back to superannuation in the next election....

2 hours 39 minutes ago

Iress has said that incident involving the unauthorised access reported this week extends beyond what was initially reported....

4 hours 41 minutes ago