Add new comment

Submitted by John De Ravin on Fri, 08/31/2018 - 13:15

I'm a SuperConcepts client and I am very disappointed that SuperConcepts appears to be opposed to a measure which, if implemented, will reduce my overall audit costs. I can understand why the accounting bodies are reluctant about the new proposal: they are concerned about the volume and lumpiness of audit fees payable to their members and about the potential for things to go wrong mainly in the context of suburban accountants with poor record keeping systems. But SuperConcepts in my experience has strong and reliable accounting systems. So why does SuperConcepts want to increase the costs I need to pay for the audit of my SMSF?

Not happy, SuperConcepts.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 3 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 3 weeks ago

The chief executive of Aware Super anticipates a significant shift in how ESG factors will influence portfolio values in the next six years, surpassing the changes witnes...

2 days 12 hours ago

Australia’s second largest super fund has added thermal coal companies to its list of investment exclusions. ...

6 hours hence

The fund has expanded its corporate superannuation solutions to partner with Australian businesses of all sizes. ...

5 hours hence