Add new comment

Submitted by Fannoowww!!! on Wed, 10/24/2018 - 11:36

Again, another mandarin telling us we don't need life insurance because theirs is supported by the Government. How about doing some research as to the overall social security costs of not having life insurance beyond the possible costs to the Age Pension. How about the costs to Sickness Allowance, Family Tax Benefit Part B, Disability Support Pension, etc.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

4 days 13 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

5 days 5 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

4 days 20 hours ago