Add new comment

Submitted by Laurie P on Thu, 07/23/2020 - 13:59

This person obviously has no idea what the regulatory requirements we must meet as Financial Planners when providing advice to retirees. Has he missed all of the changes over the past two years which have imposed significant burdens such as the new Code of Ethics, Best Interest duty, Safe Harbour steps and the list goes on.
He needs to venture out of his little Actuaries office into the real world before making such unfounded, out of touch statements.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 4 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....

16 hours ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

1 day 15 hours ago

A survey of almost 6,000 fund members has identified weakening retirement confidence, particularly among those under 55 years of age, signalling an opportunity for super ...

1 day 15 hours ago