Add new comment

Submitted by BW on Wed, 08/12/2020 - 09:21

Agree there is a disconnect between supply and demand. Bulk of population only willing to spend that amount, but I struggle to see how this demand can be met. I.e. who can supply at this price?

Can only see it working if adviser salaried employee of large fund with all the systems in place (and very high utilisation rate). E.g. $120k salary + 22% on-costs = ~$147k. 3 appointments per day @ $300 = $900 x 200 days = $180k. Leaves very little room for slack, preparation, follow-up and prospecting. Is this sustainable / realistic? Probably not.

Even then, the return is grossly outweighed by risk taken (business and compliance).

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 4 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....

10 hours 56 minutes ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

1 day 10 hours ago

A survey of almost 6,000 fund members has identified weakening retirement confidence, particularly among those under 55 years of age, signalling an opportunity for super ...

1 day 11 hours ago