Add new comment

Submitted by Peter Bostock on Thu, 04/15/2021 - 12:56

Pot-kettle?
Wilson has conflicts of interest questions to answer. Industry funds overwhelmingly have low and middle income earner members who don’t have access to bought political representation like Wilson offers to high income white retirees living in southern state beach communities.
Industry funds acting on behalf of members are providing alternative truth to the spin from commercial interests and their political allies.
Why don’t commercial super funds compete and provide the returns, services, lower fees and security of the industry funds?
Is it because of the fat profits they make? and it’s easier and cheap to pay for political representation to hamstring rivals? isn’t there a name for that?

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 3 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 3 weeks ago

With sticky inflation plaguing Australian and global markets, super funds have seen their first negative monthly return since October 2023....

1 day ago

While not having a strategic asset allocation might be ‘uncomfortable’ for some investors, the Future Fund believes its unique investment approach helps the fund capture ...

1 day ago

In its latest report, the corporate regulator says the deduction of advice fees has led to instances of “inappropriate erosion of members’ balances”....

1 day ago