Add new comment

Submitted by John steed on Tue, 09/15/2015 - 11:21

Koutsoukis is correct, I have come across at least a dozen funds that at best are toxic to their claimants and quite frankly under handed. Take for example a client who went to appeal and the insurer bullied the claimant to see one of there so called ime , the funds was then under investigation by APRA and the claimants specialist was giving expert evidence against the ime to APRA. Now how is that reasonable

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 4 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....

2 days 10 hours ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

3 days 11 hours ago

A survey of almost 6,000 fund members has identified weakening retirement confidence, particularly among those under 55 years of age, signalling an opportunity for super ...

3 days 11 hours ago