Add new comment

Submitted by Bob Henricks on Thu, 10/22/2015 - 19:29

One assumes that this change has come about due to directors of Super Funds not acting independently? If so, which funds are involved? I guess as a director of an Industry fund I could be accused of not acting independtly from time to time due to feeling the need to at all times act in the best interests of members, but then again, could one be more independent then to take such position?

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 3 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 3 weeks ago

With sticky inflation plaguing Australian and global markets, super funds have seen their first negative monthly return since October 2023....

23 hours 35 minutes ago

While not having a strategic asset allocation might be ‘uncomfortable’ for some investors, the Future Fund believes its unique investment approach helps the fund capture ...

23 hours ago

In its latest report, the corporate regulator says the deduction of advice fees has led to instances of “inappropriate erosion of members’ balances”....

1 day ago