POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
AFCA reports 135% rise in complaints handling grievances
There was a 135 per cent rise in complaints to AFCA about delays in complaints handling by superannuation funds in the financial year 2022–23, according to the AFCA annual report.
Overall, the organisation said there were 6,957 complaints related to super compared to 5,286 in the previous year.
However, the number of complaints that were resolved rose from 33 per cent to 43 per cent. Some 6,142 complaints were closed during the year and the average time taken was 102 days.
The number of complaints related to delays in claim handling rose by 135 per cent, from 737 last year to 1,738 and AFCA said this related to delays in handling insured benefit claims.
“Many superannuation complaints to AFCA can be traced back to issues with service quality, including the clarity and effectiveness of internal dispute resolution processes and the responsiveness of the trustees when questions are raised,” it said.
“While these complaints mainly related to total and permanent disability and income protection claims, AFCA is also receiving increasing numbers of complaints about delays with the finalisation and payment of death benefits.”
This was followed by service quality, account administration errors, incorrect fees and costs and failure to follow instructions.
The top problems based on product were superannuation account, which received 4,369 complaints, up from 3,009 in the previous year. This was followed by complaints about total and permanent disability (985), income protection (949), death benefit (599) and pensions (97).
Earlier this year, Super Review covered how there are issues with super funds’ internal dispute resolution (IDR) processes which is prompting to contact AFCA directly.
While members are encouraged to first contact their super fund in order to resolve a complaint via the internal dispute resolution (IDR) process, AFCA said the number of members contacting them directly is on the rise.
Of all complaints referred back by AFCA to a super fund last financial year, 55 per cent were from consumers who contacted AFCA first rather than their fund’s IDR team. From May 2023, this percentage has increased further to 66 per cent, which AFCA has flagged as a concern.
AFCA told Super Review a lack of engagement with IDR might indicate a “breakdown of trust” with the fund or inadequate identification of a member’s expression of dissatisfaction.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Laura Dew is editor at Super Review. Prior to joining SR, she spent five years working at Investment Week in the UK covering asset and wealth management.
Recommended for you
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
90.28 3 y p.a(%)
2
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
37.08 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.44 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.12 3 y p.a(%)
5
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
28.28 3 y p.a(%)
