Women are failing to make progress in terms of health, wellbeing and equity in the last two decades, as a result of having lower incomes and less superannuation than men, according to research.
A Monash University-led report Women’s Health and Wellbeing Scorecard: Towards equity for women found it would take over 200 years to reach income equity at the current rate.
As of 2020, there was a $23,767 annual income gap between the two genders, a $44,746 super gap, and a 19 percentage point gap in full-time employment.
Financial limitations were a key determinant of health, the report stated.
“Poor health is known to reduce income; and low income is known to increase risk of poor health creating a cycle of disadvantage for Australian women, with impact on women from diverse backgrounds even greater,” said report co-author Professor Helena Teede, a women’s health expert with the Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI).
“Poor health, low income and absence from the labour force comes at enormous cost, presenting a key barrier to future prosperity. Women disproportionately have lower income, and less engagement in the labour force, which drives poorer health, even in a high-income country like Australia.”
Every year, women’s labour force absence alone cost $72 billion in lost GDP.
More women experienced elevated psychological distress from financial inequity than men, the report found, which was highest in the last 20 years among women between 18-24 and 55-64 years of age.
This financial inequity further impacted their emotional and physical ability to perform their role, which declined steadily since 2001.
Associate Professor Emily Callander, report co-author and MCHRI Women’s Economics and Value Based Care Unit lead, elaborated on the economic importance of women’s health.
“Having good health, meaningful employment and a decent level of income and wealth allows individuals to fully participate in and contribute to society. These are also vital for health, wellbeing and for economic growth,” she stated.
MCHRI was working towards a world-first integrated Australian Women’s Public Health, Wellbeing and Equity Institute to address these challenges.
The report scorecard, largely based on nationally-representative data from the annual Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, would also be produced annually to track women’s financial wellbeing and health.
The $9 billion fund is backing agriculture investor GO.FARM, with its capital already directed towards enhancing two key assets.
Brighter Super is considerably scaling down the investment options it offers members in order to reduce costs.
Amid a challenging market environment, three super fund CIOs have warned against ‘jumping at shadows’.
The professional body is calling for the annual performance test to transition to a two-metric test, so it better aligns with the overarching duty of super fund trustees to act in the best financial interests of their members.
Add new comment