Add new comment

Submitted by David on Tue, 04/04/2017 - 20:35

This is actually not a rort at all - that's just a headline. It's a feature of SG in the context of salary sacrifice arrangements and has been since SG was introduced. Also remember the ATO is forgoing tax by allowing funds to be diverted by salary sacrifice. Always a feature in my salary packaging software when sg was introduced, was a choice of calculating SG on gross or nominal salary or on actual salary paid after salary sacrifice. I sort of wonder how it's a headline twenty plus years later... Any advisor recommending salary sacrifice would of course have alerted his clients to this and had it all contracted with the employer when the arrangements were made. Didn't you????

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

A “concerning” number of Aussies don’t know what they pay in super fees, a young super fund has said. ...

15 hours ago

The corporate regulator has shared some ‘disappointing’ findings upon reviewing the public communications of more than 20 trustees with regards to death benefits....

16 hours 9 minutes ago

According to the industry body, funds should have an obligation to transfer members in failing products to better-performing products in a timely way....

16 hours 30 minutes ago