Add new comment

Submitted by David Williams on Wed, 02/19/2020 - 06:11

Noel Davis is right. Super funds are not a magic pudding for trustees (and APRA) to cut a slice from if they are unable to conduct themselves effectively. APRA should have required trustees to stump up the 'reserve' funds in the first place, over perhaps a longer time. If that required trustees to increase fees then that's just the way the market works - to stay competitive they might have had to introduce some offsetting real efficiencies.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 3 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 3 weeks ago

Aware Super has outlined its systematic approach to corporate engagement as institutional investors increasingly assert their influence on company boards and take on an a...

2 hours ago

Natalie Kelly has been appointed permanently to the role following an extensive selection process....

2 hours 5 minutes ago

The country’s second-largest super fund has completed its fourth SFT this past financial year and welcomes almost 5,000 new members....

4 hours 33 minutes ago