Add new comment

Submitted by GP on Tue, 05/17/2022 - 23:49

Personally I'm not in favor of this legislation but not for the reasons of the alarmist media reports. Seriously ISA saying that 8 to 16% increase in house prices?

Not sure on what analysis, but I cannot see how a small number of house buyers who have extra cash are going to make any dent in the "overall" market. A lot of first home buyers would be lucky to have 50k in their super accounts let alone 40% of their total.

And even if it were so, it would be at the lower end of the market (likely units, certainly not properties above the median house price.

I understand a reaction to protect stakeholders, but don't be over the top.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

The sovereign wealth fund grew $11.5 billion in the March quarter, according to its latest portfolio update, having previously voiced caution about inflation’s downward t...

1 hour ago

The professional body is calling for the annual performance test to transition to a two-metric test, so it better aligns with the overarching duty of super fund trustees ...

3 hours 49 minutes ago

Christophe Picardel, Regional Head of Private Capital for Asia Pacific, Securities Services at BNP Paribas’Philippe Kerdoncuff, Head of Asset Owners and Asset Managers, A...

6 hours 43 minutes ago