Add new comment

Submitted by B Real on Thu, 03/23/2023 - 13:21

So legislation weakens insurance for super fund members, many are excluded by age and account balance limits, advisers are totally excluded from providing education and assistance through 'intra-fund' advice, the insurers lose revenue and therefore profitability and potentially sustainability, then ASIC says they have to do better?
How can you expect anyone to do better when it is legislated that they have so many hurdles to jump, lower revenues, increased admin costs etc.....

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 4 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....

1 day 2 hours ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

2 days 3 hours ago

A survey of almost 6,000 fund members has identified weakening retirement confidence, particularly among those under 55 years of age, signalling an opportunity for super ...

2 days 3 hours ago