Add new comment

Submitted by Factchecker on Fri, 05/19/2023 - 08:48

Sarah rightly points out that there are super funds, of all persuasions, that would currently struggle to meet the various and important requirements and risk factors attached to providing their members with retirement advice. But the FAAA need to be forward thinking here. Currently they sound a bit like the when the lawyers painted property conveyancing as something only qualified, licensed, trained and practicing legal eagles could or should do.
We all now know that’s not the case and clients have greatly benefited from that evolution.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 4 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....

12 hours ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

1 day 11 hours ago

A survey of almost 6,000 fund members has identified weakening retirement confidence, particularly among those under 55 years of age, signalling an opportunity for super ...

1 day 12 hours ago